<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Multi-Agent-Systems on Kuldeep Pisda</title><link>https://kdpisda.in/tag/multi-agent-systems/</link><description>Recent content in Multi-Agent-Systems on Kuldeep Pisda</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 09:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://kdpisda.in/tag/multi-agent-systems/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Sakana AI's Fugu Ultra v2: When Orchestration Beats a Bigger Model</title><link>https://kdpisda.in/sakana-ai-fugu-max-ultra-v2-orchestration/</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 09:00:00 +0530</pubDate><guid>https://kdpisda.in/sakana-ai-fugu-max-ultra-v2-orchestration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For a decade the AI industry has raced along one axis: make the model bigger. Sakana AI&amp;rsquo;s latest release argues the axis that actually matters is two-dimensional, capability against cost, and that the winning move isn&amp;rsquo;t a bigger single model at all. Fugu Max and Fugu Ultra v2, shipped this week, are built around a router that decides which of a pool of smaller, cheaper models should handle a given piece of work, and that can call another instance of itself when a task needs breaking down further. The headline result: Fugu Ultra v2 beats Anthropic&amp;rsquo;s Opus 5 and Fable 5 on a visual reasoning benchmark while including neither of those models, nor GPT-6 Astra, in its own pool. If that holds up, it says something uncomfortable for labs betting everything on scaling one model: a well-trained conductor can out-perform the frontier soloist it&amp;rsquo;s conducting around.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>