<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>test automation best practices on Kuldeep Pisda</title><link>https://kdpisda.in/tag/test-automation-best-practices/</link><description>Recent content in test automation best practices on Kuldeep Pisda</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 12:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://kdpisda.in/tag/test-automation-best-practices/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Test Automation Best Practices That Won't Make You Want to Flip Your Desk</title><link>https://kdpisda.in/test-automation-best-practices-that-wont-make-you-want-to-flip-your-desk/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 12:50:48 +0530</pubDate><guid>https://kdpisda.in/test-automation-best-practices-that-wont-make-you-want-to-flip-your-desk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have all been there. You push a feature, the CI pipeline lights up green, and you move on, only to find a frantic message hours later about a regression in production. That momentary confidence shatters, replaced by a sinking feeling. It&amp;rsquo;s a common story in fast moving startups and scale ups, where the pressure to ship often turns test suites into a fragile, high maintenance burden. The problem is not a lack of tests, but a lack of strategy. Flaky tests and unexpected breaks are often symptoms of deeper issues, where the cost of maintaining the test suite starts to outweigh its benefits.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>